2009 BMW M3 vs. 2012 Opel Ampera
To start off, 2012 Opel Ampera is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2009 BMW M3. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2009 BMW M3 would be higher.
Because 2009 BMW M3 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2009 BMW M3. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Opel Ampera, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2009 BMW M3 | 2012 Opel Ampera | |
| Make | BMW | Opel |
| Model | M3 | Ampera |
| Year Released | 2009 | 2012 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Horse Power | 414 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Single Speed |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 4590 mm | 4498 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1788 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1438 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2770 mm | 2685 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Highway | 11.9 L/100km | 2.5 L/100km |
| Fuel Consumption City | 17 L/100km | 2.5 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 63 L | 35 L |
