2009 BMW M3 vs. 2012 Volkswagen up
To start off, 2012 Volkswagen up is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2009 BMW M3. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2009 BMW M3 would be higher. At 3,999 cc (8 cylinders), 2009 BMW M3 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 BMW M3 weights approximately 391 kg more than 2012 Volkswagen up.
Because 2009 BMW M3 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2009 BMW M3. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Volkswagen up, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2009 BMW M3 | 2012 Volkswagen up | |
Make | BMW | Volkswagen |
Model | M3 | up |
Year Released | 2009 | 2012 |
Body Type | Convertible | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3999 cc | 1000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 414 HP | 0 HP |
Engine RPM | 8300 RPM | 75 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1320 kg | 929 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4620 mm | 3450 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1400 mm | 1640 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1810 mm | 1480 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2770 mm | 2420 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 12.9 L/100km | 4.7 L/100km |