2009 BMW M3 vs. 2013 Ferrari California
To start off, 2013 Ferrari California is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2009 BMW M3. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2009 BMW M3 would be higher.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Ferrari California (504 Nm) has 209 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 BMW M3. (295 Nm). This means 2013 Ferrari California will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 BMW M3.
Compare all specifications:
| 2009 BMW M3 | 2013 Ferrari California | |
| Make | BMW | Ferrari |
| Model | M3 | California |
| Year Released | 2009 | 2013 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 414 HP | 0 HP |
| Torque | 295 Nm | 504 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Premium |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed manual |
| Vehicle Length | 4590 mm | 4562 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1902 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1308 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2770 mm | 2670 mm |
| Fuel Consumption | 11.9 L/100km | 13.1 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 63 L | 78 L |
