2009 BMW M3 vs. 2013 Honda Fit
To start off, 2013 Honda Fit is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2009 BMW M3. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2009 BMW M3 would be higher. At 3,999 cc (8 cylinders), 2009 BMW M3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 BMW M3 (414 HP @ 8300 RPM) has 299 more horse power than 2013 Honda Fit. (115 HP @ 6600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 BMW M3 should accelerate faster than 2013 Honda Fit.
Because 2009 BMW M3 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2009 BMW M3. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Honda Fit, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 BMW M3 (295 Nm @ 3900 RPM) has 151 more torque (in Nm) than 2013 Honda Fit. (144 Nm @ 4800 RPM). This means 2009 BMW M3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2013 Honda Fit.
Compare all specifications:
| 2009 BMW M3 | 2013 Honda Fit | |
| Make | BMW | Honda |
| Model | M3 | Fit |
| Year Released | 2009 | 2013 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3999 cc | 1497 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 414 HP | 115 HP |
| Engine RPM | 8300 RPM | 6600 RPM |
| Torque | 295 Nm | 144 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3900 RPM | 4800 RPM |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 12.0:1 | 10.4 : 1 |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | 5-speed manual |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 4590 mm | 4105 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1695 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1525 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2770 mm | 2500 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Highway | 11.9 L/100km | 5.7 L/100km |
| Fuel Consumption City | 17 L/100km | 7.1 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 63 L | 40 L |
