2009 BMW M3 vs. 2013 Jeep Wrangler

To start off, 2013 Jeep Wrangler is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2009 BMW M3. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2009 BMW M3 would be higher. At 3,999 cc (8 cylinders), 2009 BMW M3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 BMW M3 (414 HP @ 8300 RPM) has 133 more horse power than 2013 Jeep Wrangler. (281 HP @ 6400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 BMW M3 should accelerate faster than 2013 Jeep Wrangler.

Because 2013 Jeep Wrangler is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2009 BMW M3. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Jeep Wrangler will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Jeep Wrangler (353 Nm @ 4800 RPM) has 58 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 BMW M3. (295 Nm @ 3900 RPM). This means 2013 Jeep Wrangler will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 BMW M3.

Compare all specifications:

2009 BMW M3 2013 Jeep Wrangler
Make BMW Jeep
Model M3 Wrangler
Year Released 2009 2013
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 3999 cc 3600 cc
Engine Cylinders 8 cylinders 6 cylinders
Engine Type V V
Valves per Cylinder 4 valves 4 valves
Horse Power 414 HP 281 HP
Engine RPM 8300 RPM 6400 RPM
Torque 295 Nm 353 Nm
Torque RPM 3900 RPM 4800 RPM
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Rear 4WD
Transmission Type Manual 6-speed manual
Number of Seats 4 seats 5 seats
Vehicle Length 4590 mm 4684 mm
Vehicle Width 1820 mm 1877 mm
Vehicle Height 1450 mm 1798 mm
Wheelbase Size 2770 mm 2946 mm
Fuel Consumption Highway 11.9 L/100km 9.6 L/100km
Fuel Consumption City 17 L/100km 13.4 L/100km
Fuel Tank Capacity 63 L 85 L