2009 BMW M5 vs. 1988 Mazda 323
To start off, 2009 BMW M5 is newer by 21 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1988 Mazda 323. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1988 Mazda 323 would be higher. At 4,999 cc (10 cylinders), 2009 BMW M5 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 BMW M5 (500 HP @ 7750 RPM) has 434 more horse power than 1988 Mazda 323. (66 HP @ 5800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 BMW M5 should accelerate faster than 1988 Mazda 323. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 BMW M5 weights approximately 888 kg more than 1988 Mazda 323. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2009 BMW M5 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2009 BMW M5. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1988 Mazda 323, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 BMW M5 (519 Nm @ 6100 RPM) has 418 more torque (in Nm) than 1988 Mazda 323. (101 Nm @ 3600 RPM). This means 2009 BMW M5 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1988 Mazda 323.
Compare all specifications:
2009 BMW M5 | 1988 Mazda 323 | |
Make | BMW | Mazda |
Model | M5 | 323 |
Year Released | 2009 | 1988 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4999 cc | 1324 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 10 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 500 HP | 66 HP |
Engine RPM | 7750 RPM | 5800 RPM |
Torque | 519 Nm | 101 Nm |
Torque RPM | 6100 RPM | 3600 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1758 kg | 870 kg |
Vehicle Width | 1850 mm | 1480 mm |