2009 BMW M6 vs. 1961 Ford Thunderbird
To start off, 2009 BMW M6 is newer by 48 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1961 Ford Thunderbird. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1961 Ford Thunderbird would be higher. At 6,638 cc (8 cylinders), 1961 Ford Thunderbird is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 BMW M6 (500 HP @ 7750 RPM) has 161 more horse power than 1961 Ford Thunderbird. (339 HP @ 4800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 BMW M6 should accelerate faster than 1961 Ford Thunderbird. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1961 Ford Thunderbird weights approximately 350 kg more than 2009 BMW M6.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2009 BMW M6 | 1961 Ford Thunderbird | |
Make | BMW | Ford |
Model | M6 | Thunderbird |
Year Released | 2009 | 1961 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4999 cc | 6638 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 10 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 500 HP | 339 HP |
Engine RPM | 7750 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1525 kg | 1875 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4880 mm | 5210 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1930 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1340 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2790 mm | 2880 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 70 L | 50 L |