2009 BMW M6 vs. 1968 Zastava 850 K
To start off, 2009 BMW M6 is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Zastava 850 K. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Zastava 850 K would be higher. At 4,999 cc (10 cylinders), 2009 BMW M6 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 BMW M6 (500 HP @ 7750 RPM) has 465 more horse power than 1968 Zastava 850 K. (35 HP @ 5400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 BMW M6 should accelerate faster than 1968 Zastava 850 K. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 BMW M6 weights approximately 670 kg more than 1968 Zastava 850 K. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2009 BMW M6 | 1968 Zastava 850 K | |
Make | BMW | Zastava |
Model | M6 | 850 K |
Year Released | 2009 | 1968 |
Engine Size | 4999 cc | 848 cc |
Horse Power | 500 HP | 35 HP |
Engine RPM | 7750 RPM | 5400 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1525 kg | 855 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4880 mm | 3740 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1490 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1700 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2790 mm | 2010 mm |