2009 BMW M6 vs. 2002 Chrysler Grand Voyager
To start off, 2009 BMW M6 is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Chrysler Grand Voyager. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Chrysler Grand Voyager would be higher. At 4,999 cc (10 cylinders), 2009 BMW M6 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 BMW M6 (500 HP @ 7750 RPM) has 350 more horse power than 2002 Chrysler Grand Voyager. (150 HP @ 5100 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 BMW M6 should accelerate faster than 2002 Chrysler Grand Voyager. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Chrysler Grand Voyager weights approximately 485 kg more than 2009 BMW M6.
Because 2009 BMW M6 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2009 BMW M6. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Chrysler Grand Voyager, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 BMW M6 (519 Nm @ 6100 RPM) has 309 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Chrysler Grand Voyager. (210 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2009 BMW M6 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Chrysler Grand Voyager.
Compare all specifications:
2009 BMW M6 | 2002 Chrysler Grand Voyager | |
Make | BMW | Chrysler |
Model | M6 | Grand Voyager |
Year Released | 2009 | 2002 |
Body Type | Coupe | Minivan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4999 cc | 2427 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 10 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 500 HP | 150 HP |
Engine RPM | 7750 RPM | 5100 RPM |
Torque | 519 Nm | 210 Nm |
Torque RPM | 6100 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 12.0:1 | 10.0:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 7 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1280 kg | 1765 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4880 mm | 5100 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 2010 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1760 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2790 mm | 2960 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 18.2 L/100km | 12.4 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 70 L | 87 L |