2009 BMW M6 vs. 2002 Jaguar X400
To start off, 2009 BMW M6 is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Jaguar X400. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Jaguar X400 would be higher. At 4,999 cc (10 cylinders), 2009 BMW M6 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 BMW M6 (500 HP @ 7750 RPM) has 110 more horse power than 2002 Jaguar X400. (390 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 BMW M6 should accelerate faster than 2002 Jaguar X400. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 BMW M6 weights approximately 205 kg more than 2002 Jaguar X400. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2002 Jaguar X400 (525 Nm) has 5 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 BMW M6. (520 Nm). This means 2002 Jaguar X400 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 BMW M6. 2002 Jaguar X400 has automatic transmission and 2009 BMW M6 has manual transmission. 2009 BMW M6 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2002 Jaguar X400 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2009 BMW M6 | 2002 Jaguar X400 | |
Make | BMW | Jaguar |
Model | M6 | X400 |
Year Released | 2009 | 2002 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4999 cc | 4196 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 10 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 500 HP | 390 HP |
Engine RPM | 7750 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 520 Nm | 525 Nm |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 2005 kg | 1800 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2790 mm | 2920 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 70 L | 69 L |