2009 BMW M6 vs. 2004 Daewoo Rezzo
To start off, 2009 BMW M6 is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Daewoo Rezzo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Daewoo Rezzo would be higher. At 4,999 cc (10 cylinders), 2009 BMW M6 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 BMW M6 (501 HP @ 7750 RPM) has 396 more horse power than 2004 Daewoo Rezzo. (105 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 BMW M6 should accelerate faster than 2004 Daewoo Rezzo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 BMW M6 weights approximately 438 kg more than 2004 Daewoo Rezzo. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2009 BMW M6 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2009 BMW M6. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Daewoo Rezzo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 BMW M6 (520 Nm @ 6100 RPM) has 378 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Daewoo Rezzo. (142 Nm @ 3400 RPM). This means 2009 BMW M6 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Daewoo Rezzo. 2009 BMW M6 has automatic transmission and 2004 Daewoo Rezzo has manual transmission. 2004 Daewoo Rezzo will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2009 BMW M6 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 2009 BMW M6 | 2004 Daewoo Rezzo | |
| Make | BMW | Daewoo |
| Model | M6 | Rezzo |
| Year Released | 2009 | 2004 |
| Body Type | Coupe | Minivan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4999 cc | 1598 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 10 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 501 HP | 105 HP |
| Engine RPM | 7750 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 520 Nm | 142 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 6100 RPM | 3400 RPM |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 12.0:1 | 10.0:1 |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline - Premium |
| Top Speed | 250 km/hour | 162 km/hour |
| Acceleration 0-100mph | 4.6 seconds | 12.2 seconds |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1785 kg | 1347 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4880 mm | 4360 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1380 mm | 1760 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1860 mm | 1590 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2790 mm | 2610 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Overall | 14.8 L/100km | 8.3 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 70 L | 60 L |
