2009 BMW M6 vs. 2005 Cadillac SRX

To start off, 2009 BMW M6 is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Cadillac SRX. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Cadillac SRX would be higher. At 4,999 cc (10 cylinders), 2009 BMW M6 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 BMW M6 (500 HP @ 7750 RPM) has 245 more horse power than 2005 Cadillac SRX. (255 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 BMW M6 should accelerate faster than 2005 Cadillac SRX. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 BMW M6 weights approximately 116 kg more than 2005 Cadillac SRX. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 BMW M6 (520 Nm) has 178 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Cadillac SRX. (342 Nm). This means 2009 BMW M6 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Cadillac SRX. 2005 Cadillac SRX has automatic transmission and 2009 BMW M6 has manual transmission. 2009 BMW M6 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2005 Cadillac SRX will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications:

2009 BMW M6 2005 Cadillac SRX
Make BMW Cadillac
Model M6 SRX
Year Released 2009 2005
Body Type Convertible SUV
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 4999 cc 3556 cc
Engine Cylinders 10 cylinders 6 cylinders
Engine Type V V
Valves per Cylinder 4 valves 4 valves
Horse Power 500 HP 255 HP
Engine RPM 7750 RPM 6000 RPM
Torque 520 Nm 342 Nm
Engine Bore Size 92 mm 94 mm
Engine Stroke Size 75.2 mm 86 mm
Engine Compression Ratio 12.0:1 10.2:1
Drive Type Rear Rear
Transmission Type Manual Automatic
Number of Seats 4 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 2 doors 5 doors
Vehicle Weight 2005 kg 1889 kg
Vehicle Length 4880 mm 4960 mm
Vehicle Width 1860 mm 1850 mm
Vehicle Height 1380 mm 1730 mm
Wheelbase Size 2790 mm 3090 mm
Fuel Consumption Overall 15.2 L/100km 12.5 L/100km
Fuel Tank Capacity 70 L 76 L


 

More Comparisons

Resources

Replacing Your Front Disc Brakes Made Simple: The Definitive DIY Guide
Replace the front disc brakes of your vehicle and save money on labour cost. Read this guide to learn how. [read more]
What to look for when buying a used/second hand car.
Diligence through every step of the buying process will help you find a reliable used car and avoid any unpleasant surprises. [read more]
Step-by-Step Guide on How to Perform an Oil Change on Your Car
One of the most effective ways of saving money on car maintenance is to change the oil yourself. [read more]