2009 BMW M6 vs. 2005 Mazda B3000
To start off, 2009 BMW M6 is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Mazda B3000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Mazda B3000 would be higher. At 4,999 cc (10 cylinders), 2009 BMW M6 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 BMW M6 (500 HP @ 7750 RPM) has 346 more horse power than 2005 Mazda B3000. (154 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 BMW M6 should accelerate faster than 2005 Mazda B3000. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Mazda B3000 weights approximately 391 kg more than 2009 BMW M6.
Let's talk about torque, 2009 BMW M6 (519 Nm) has 279 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Mazda B3000. (240 Nm). This means 2009 BMW M6 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Mazda B3000.
Compare all specifications:
2009 BMW M6 | 2005 Mazda B3000 | |
Make | BMW | Mazda |
Model | M6 | B3000 |
Year Released | 2009 | 2005 |
Body Type | Coupe | Pickup |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4999 cc | 2966 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 10 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 500 HP | 154 HP |
Engine RPM | 7750 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 519 Nm | 240 Nm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 12.0:1 | 9.1:1 |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1280 kg | 1671 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4880 mm | 5160 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1790 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1720 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2790 mm | 3200 mm |
Fuel Consumption Highway | 14 L/100km | 10.2 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 21.5 L/100km | 13.1 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 18.2 L/100km | 11.8 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 70 L | 74 L |