2009 BMW X3 vs. 1964 Holden EJ
To start off, 2009 BMW X3 is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Holden EJ. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Holden EJ would be higher. At 2,993 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 BMW X3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 BMW X3 (282 HP @ 4400 RPM) has 218 more horse power than 1964 Holden EJ. (64 HP @ 4200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 BMW X3 should accelerate faster than 1964 Holden EJ.
Because 2009 BMW X3 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1964 Holden EJ. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 BMW X3 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 BMW X3 (580 Nm @ 1750 RPM) has 417 more torque (in Nm) than 1964 Holden EJ. (163 Nm @ 1400 RPM). This means 2009 BMW X3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1964 Holden EJ.
Compare all specifications:
2009 BMW X3 | 1964 Holden EJ | |
Make | BMW | Holden |
Model | X3 | EJ |
Year Released | 2009 | 1964 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2993 cc | 2260 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 282 HP | 64 HP |
Engine RPM | 4400 RPM | 4200 RPM |
Torque | 580 Nm | 163 Nm |
Torque RPM | 1750 RPM | 1400 RPM |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Vehicle Length | 4580 mm | 4500 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1740 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1680 mm | 1480 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2800 mm | 2680 mm |