2009 BMW X3 vs. 1976 Suzuki LJ 50
To start off, 2009 BMW X3 is newer by 33 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1976 Suzuki LJ 50. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1976 Suzuki LJ 50 would be higher. At 2,979 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 BMW X3 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 BMW X3 weights approximately 1141 kg more than 1976 Suzuki LJ 50.
Both vehicles are four wheel drive (4WD) - it offers better handling, traction, and control in all driving conditions compared with front wheel drive or rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 BMW X3 (300 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 248 more torque (in Nm) than 1976 Suzuki LJ 50. (52 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2009 BMW X3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1976 Suzuki LJ 50.
Compare all specifications:
2009 BMW X3 | 1976 Suzuki LJ 50 | |
Make | BMW | Suzuki |
Model | X3 | LJ 50 |
Year Released | 2009 | 1976 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2979 cc | 539 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 228 HP | 0 HP |
Torque | 300 Nm | 52 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | 4WD |
Vehicle Weight | 1836 kg | 695 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4570 mm | 3280 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1420 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1680 mm | 1690 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2800 mm | 1940 mm |