2009 BMW X3 vs. 1983 Jeep CJ

To start off, 2009 BMW X3 is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Jeep CJ. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Jeep CJ would be higher. Both 2009 BMW X3 and 1983 Jeep CJ are equipped with a 1,995 cc engine. In terms of performance, 2009 BMW X3 (148 HP @ 6200 RPM) has 63 more horse power than 1983 Jeep CJ. (85 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 BMW X3 should accelerate faster than 1983 Jeep CJ. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 BMW X3 weights approximately 366 kg more than 1983 Jeep CJ. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Both vehicles are four wheel drive (4WD) - it offers better handling, traction, and control in all driving conditions compared with front wheel drive or rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 BMW X3 (200 Nm @ 3750 RPM) has 50 more torque (in Nm) than 1983 Jeep CJ. (150 Nm @ 2750 RPM). This means 2009 BMW X3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1983 Jeep CJ.

Compare all specifications:

2009 BMW X3 1983 Jeep CJ
Make BMW Jeep
Model X3 CJ
Year Released 2009 1983
Body Type SUV SUV
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 1995 cc 1995 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Horse Power 148 HP 85 HP
Engine RPM 6200 RPM 5000 RPM
Torque 200 Nm 150 Nm
Torque RPM 3750 RPM 2750 RPM
Fuel Type Gasoline - Premium Gasoline
Drive Type 4WD 4WD
Vehicle Weight 1656 kg 1290 kg
Vehicle Length 4570 mm 3900 mm
Vehicle Width 1860 mm 1670 mm
Vehicle Height 1680 mm 1840 mm
Wheelbase Size 2800 mm 2380 mm