2009 BMW X3 vs. 2000 GMC Safari
To start off, 2009 BMW X3 is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 GMC Safari. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 GMC Safari would be higher. At 4,294 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 GMC Safari is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 GMC Safari (190 HP) has 42 more horse power than 2009 BMW X3. (148 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2000 GMC Safari should accelerate faster than 2009 BMW X3. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 GMC Safari weights approximately 300 kg more than 2009 BMW X3. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2009 BMW X3 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2000 GMC Safari. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 BMW X3 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 GMC Safari (319 Nm) has 119 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 BMW X3. (200 Nm). This means 2000 GMC Safari will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 BMW X3.
Compare all specifications:
2009 BMW X3 | 2000 GMC Safari | |
Make | BMW | GMC |
Model | X3 | Safari |
Year Released | 2009 | 2000 |
Body Type | SUV | Van |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1995 cc | 4294 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 148 HP | 190 HP |
Torque | 200 Nm | 319 Nm |
Top Speed | 198 km/hour | 165 km/hour |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 8 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1656 kg | 1956 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4570 mm | 4830 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1960 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1680 mm | 1940 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2800 mm | 2830 mm |