2009 BMW X3 vs. 2001 Chevrolet Tracker
To start off, 2009 BMW X3 is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 Chevrolet Tracker. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 Chevrolet Tracker would be higher. At 2,979 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 BMW X3 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 BMW X3 weights approximately 296 kg more than 2001 Chevrolet Tracker.
Both vehicles are four wheel drive (4WD) - it offers better handling, traction, and control in all driving conditions compared with front wheel drive or rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 BMW X3 (300 Nm) has 83 more torque (in Nm) than 2001 Chevrolet Tracker. (217 Nm). This means 2009 BMW X3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2001 Chevrolet Tracker.
Compare all specifications:
| 2009 BMW X3 | 2001 Chevrolet Tracker | |
| Make | BMW | Chevrolet |
| Model | X3 | Tracker |
| Year Released | 2009 | 2001 |
| Body Type | SUV | SUV |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2979 cc | 2499 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 228 HP | 0 HP |
| Torque | 300 Nm | 217 Nm |
| Drive Type | 4WD | 4WD |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1836 kg | 1540 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4570 mm | 3860 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1720 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1680 mm | 1700 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2800 mm | 2210 mm |
