2009 BMW X3 vs. 2004 Ford E-150
To start off, 2009 BMW X3 is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Ford E-150. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Ford E-150 would be higher. At 4,605 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Ford E-150 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 BMW X3 (260 HP @ 6600 RPM) has 35 more horse power than 2004 Ford E-150. (225 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 BMW X3 should accelerate faster than 2004 Ford E-150. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Ford E-150 weights approximately 397 kg more than 2009 BMW X3.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Ford E-150 (388 Nm) has 83 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 BMW X3. (305 Nm). This means 2004 Ford E-150 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 BMW X3.
Compare all specifications:
| 2009 BMW X3 | 2004 Ford E-150 | |
| Make | BMW | Ford |
| Model | X3 | E-150 |
| Year Released | 2009 | 2004 |
| Body Type | SUV | Van |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2996 cc | 4605 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 260 HP | 225 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6600 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Torque | 305 Nm | 388 Nm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 10.7:1 | 9.0:1 |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 3 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1730 kg | 2127 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4580 mm | 5390 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 2020 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1680 mm | 2060 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2800 mm | 3510 mm |
| Fuel Consumption | 10.4 L/100km | 12.4 L/100km |
| Fuel Consumption City | 14.9 L/100km | 15.7 L/100km |
| Fuel Consumption Overall | 12.5 L/100km | 14.7 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 67 L | 132 L |
