2009 BMW X3 vs. 2006 Volvo S60

To start off, 2009 BMW X3 is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 Volvo S60. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 Volvo S60 would be higher. At 2,993 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 BMW X3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 BMW X3 (282 HP @ 4400 RPM) has 114 more horse power than 2006 Volvo S60. (168 HP @ 5900 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 BMW X3 should accelerate faster than 2006 Volvo S60.

Because 2009 BMW X3 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2006 Volvo S60. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 BMW X3 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 BMW X3 (580 Nm @ 1750 RPM) has 350 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Volvo S60. (230 Nm @ 4500 RPM). This means 2009 BMW X3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Volvo S60.

Compare all specifications:

2009 BMW X3 2006 Volvo S60
Make BMW Volvo
Model X3 S60
Year Released 2009 2006
Body Type SUV Sedan
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 2993 cc 2435 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 5 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Valves per Cylinder 4 valves 4 valves
Horse Power 282 HP 168 HP
Engine RPM 4400 RPM 5900 RPM
Torque 580 Nm 230 Nm
Torque RPM 1750 RPM 4500 RPM
Engine Compression Ratio 17.0:1 10.3:1
Fuel Type Diesel Gasoline - Premium
Acceleration 0-100mph 6.6 seconds 8.7 seconds
Drive Type 4WD Front
Transmission Type Automatic Automatic
Number of Seats 5 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 5 doors 4 doors
Vehicle Length 4580 mm 4580 mm
Vehicle Width 1860 mm 1810 mm
Vehicle Height 1680 mm 1430 mm
Wheelbase Size 2800 mm 2720 mm
Fuel Consumption Overall 8.9 L/100km 8.9 L/100km
Fuel Tank Capacity 67 L 70 L