2009 BMW X3 vs. 2008 Chevrolet Equinox
To start off, 2009 BMW X3 is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2008 Chevrolet Equinox. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2008 Chevrolet Equinox would be higher. At 3,425 cc (6 cylinders), 2008 Chevrolet Equinox is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Chevrolet Equinox (185 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 37 more horse power than 2009 BMW X3. (148 HP @ 6200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2008 Chevrolet Equinox should accelerate faster than 2009 BMW X3. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Chevrolet Equinox weights approximately 94 kg more than 2009 BMW X3. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are four wheel drive (4WD) - it offers better handling, traction, and control in all driving conditions compared with front wheel drive or rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Chevrolet Equinox (285 Nm @ 3800 RPM) has 85 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 BMW X3. (200 Nm @ 3750 RPM). This means 2008 Chevrolet Equinox will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 BMW X3.
Compare all specifications:
2009 BMW X3 | 2008 Chevrolet Equinox | |
Make | BMW | Chevrolet |
Model | X3 | Equinox |
Year Released | 2009 | 2008 |
Body Type | SUV | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1995 cc | 3425 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 148 HP | 185 HP |
Engine RPM | 6200 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Torque | 200 Nm | 285 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3750 RPM | 3800 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.5:1 | 9.5:1 |
Drive Type | 4WD | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1656 kg | 1750 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4570 mm | 4800 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1820 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1680 mm | 1710 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2800 mm | 2860 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 9.3 L/100km | 11.4 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 67 L | 61 L |