2009 BMW X5 vs. 1963 Triumph Vitesse
To start off, 2009 BMW X5 is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Triumph Vitesse. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Triumph Vitesse would be higher. At 2,979 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 BMW X5 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 BMW X5 (265 HP @ 4200 RPM) has 195 more horse power than 1963 Triumph Vitesse. (70 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 BMW X5 should accelerate faster than 1963 Triumph Vitesse.
Because 2009 BMW X5 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1963 Triumph Vitesse. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 BMW X5 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 BMW X5 (576 Nm @ 1750 RPM) has 451 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Triumph Vitesse. (125 Nm @ 2800 RPM). This means 2009 BMW X5 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Triumph Vitesse.
Compare all specifications:
2009 BMW X5 | 1963 Triumph Vitesse | |
Make | BMW | Triumph |
Model | X5 | Vitesse |
Year Released | 2009 | 1963 |
Body Type | SUV | Convertible |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2979 cc | 1596 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 265 HP | 70 HP |
Engine RPM | 4200 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 576 Nm | 125 Nm |
Torque RPM | 1750 RPM | 2800 RPM |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4860 mm | 3890 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1940 mm | 1530 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1770 mm | 1340 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2940 mm | 2270 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 85 L | 53 L |