2009 BMW X5 vs. 1974 Mazda 818
To start off, 2009 BMW X5 is newer by 35 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1974 Mazda 818. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1974 Mazda 818 would be higher. At 2,993 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 BMW X5 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 BMW X5 (232 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 164 more horse power than 1974 Mazda 818. (68 HP @ 6200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 BMW X5 should accelerate faster than 1974 Mazda 818. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 BMW X5 weights approximately 1150 kg more than 1974 Mazda 818. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2009 BMW X5 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1974 Mazda 818. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 BMW X5 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 BMW X5 (521 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 429 more torque (in Nm) than 1974 Mazda 818. (92 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2009 BMW X5 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1974 Mazda 818.
Compare all specifications:
2009 BMW X5 | 1974 Mazda 818 | |
Make | BMW | Mazda |
Model | X5 | 818 |
Year Released | 2009 | 1974 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2993 cc | 1272 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 232 HP | 68 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 6200 RPM |
Torque | 521 Nm | 92 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 2150 kg | 1000 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4860 mm | 4100 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1940 mm | 1600 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1740 mm | 1410 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2940 mm | 2320 mm |