2009 BMW X5 vs. 1980 Mitsubishi Celeste
To start off, 2009 BMW X5 is newer by 29 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Mitsubishi Celeste. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Mitsubishi Celeste would be higher. At 4,799 cc (8 cylinders), 2009 BMW X5 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 BMW X5 (350 HP) has 276 more horse power than 1980 Mitsubishi Celeste. (74 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2009 BMW X5 should accelerate faster than 1980 Mitsubishi Celeste.
Because 2009 BMW X5 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1980 Mitsubishi Celeste. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 BMW X5 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 BMW X5 (475 Nm @ 3400 RPM) has 357 more torque (in Nm) than 1980 Mitsubishi Celeste. (118 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 2009 BMW X5 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1980 Mitsubishi Celeste.
Compare all specifications:
2009 BMW X5 | 1980 Mitsubishi Celeste | |
Make | BMW | Mitsubishi |
Model | X5 | Celeste |
Year Released | 2009 | 1980 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4799 cc | 1410 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 350 HP | 74 HP |
Torque | 475 Nm | 118 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3400 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Vehicle Length | 4860 mm | 4160 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1940 mm | 1620 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1770 mm | 1350 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2940 mm | 2350 mm |