2009 BMW X5 vs. 1980 Oldsmobile Cutlass
To start off, 2009 BMW X5 is newer by 29 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Oldsmobile Cutlass. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Oldsmobile Cutlass would be higher. At 4,799 cc (8 cylinders), 2009 BMW X5 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 BMW X5 (350 HP @ 6300 RPM) has 230 more horse power than 1980 Oldsmobile Cutlass. (120 HP @ 3600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 BMW X5 should accelerate faster than 1980 Oldsmobile Cutlass. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 BMW X5 weights approximately 39 kg more than 1980 Oldsmobile Cutlass. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2009 BMW X5 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1980 Oldsmobile Cutlass. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 BMW X5 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 BMW X5 (476 Nm) has 171 more torque (in Nm) than 1980 Oldsmobile Cutlass. (305 Nm). This means 2009 BMW X5 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1980 Oldsmobile Cutlass.
Compare all specifications:
2009 BMW X5 | 1980 Oldsmobile Cutlass | |
Make | BMW | Oldsmobile |
Model | X5 | Cutlass |
Year Released | 2009 | 1980 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4799 cc | 4343 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 350 HP | 120 HP |
Engine RPM | 6300 RPM | 3600 RPM |
Torque | 476 Nm | 305 Nm |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Vehicle Weight | 1525 kg | 1486 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2940 mm | 2750 mm |