2009 BMW X5 vs. 1980 Volvo 265
To start off, 2009 BMW X5 is newer by 29 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Volvo 265. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Volvo 265 would be higher. At 2,979 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 BMW X5 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 BMW X5 (265 HP @ 4200 RPM) has 183 more horse power than 1980 Volvo 265. (82 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 BMW X5 should accelerate faster than 1980 Volvo 265.
Because 2009 BMW X5 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1980 Volvo 265. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 BMW X5 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 BMW X5 (576 Nm @ 1750 RPM) has 431 more torque (in Nm) than 1980 Volvo 265. (145 Nm @ 2800 RPM). This means 2009 BMW X5 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1980 Volvo 265.
Compare all specifications:
2009 BMW X5 | 1980 Volvo 265 | |
Make | BMW | Volvo |
Model | X5 | 265 |
Year Released | 2009 | 1980 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2979 cc | 2315 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 265 HP | 82 HP |
Engine RPM | 4200 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 576 Nm | 145 Nm |
Torque RPM | 1750 RPM | 2800 RPM |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Diesel |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4860 mm | 4890 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1940 mm | 1720 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1770 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2940 mm | 2660 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 85 L | 58 L |