2009 BMW X5 vs. 1982 Jeep CJ7
To start off, 2009 BMW X5 is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Jeep CJ7. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Jeep CJ7 would be higher. At 2,979 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 BMW X5 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 BMW X5 (265 HP @ 4200 RPM) has 180 more horse power than 1982 Jeep CJ7. (85 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 BMW X5 should accelerate faster than 1982 Jeep CJ7.
Both vehicles are four wheel drive (4WD) - it offers better handling, traction, and control in all driving conditions compared with front wheel drive or rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 BMW X5 (576 Nm @ 1750 RPM) has 426 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Jeep CJ7. (150 Nm @ 2750 RPM). This means 2009 BMW X5 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Jeep CJ7. 2009 BMW X5 has automatic transmission and 1982 Jeep CJ7 has manual transmission. 1982 Jeep CJ7 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2009 BMW X5 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2009 BMW X5 | 1982 Jeep CJ7 | |
Make | BMW | Jeep |
Model | X5 | CJ7 |
Year Released | 2009 | 1982 |
Body Type | SUV | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2979 cc | 1995 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 265 HP | 85 HP |
Engine RPM | 4200 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 576 Nm | 150 Nm |
Torque RPM | 1750 RPM | 2750 RPM |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Vehicle Length | 4860 mm | 3900 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1940 mm | 1670 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1770 mm | 1840 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2940 mm | 2380 mm |