2009 BMW X5 vs. 1982 Suzuki SJ 410
To start off, 2009 BMW X5 is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Suzuki SJ 410. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Suzuki SJ 410 would be higher. At 2,979 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 BMW X5 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 BMW X5 (265 HP @ 4200 RPM) has 221 more horse power than 1982 Suzuki SJ 410. (44 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 BMW X5 should accelerate faster than 1982 Suzuki SJ 410.
Both vehicles are four wheel drive (4WD) - it offers better handling, traction, and control in all driving conditions compared with front wheel drive or rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 BMW X5 (576 Nm @ 1750 RPM) has 502 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Suzuki SJ 410. (74 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2009 BMW X5 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Suzuki SJ 410.
Compare all specifications:
2009 BMW X5 | 1982 Suzuki SJ 410 | |
Make | BMW | Suzuki |
Model | X5 | SJ 410 |
Year Released | 2009 | 1982 |
Body Type | SUV | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2979 cc | 970 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 265 HP | 44 HP |
Engine RPM | 4200 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 576 Nm | 74 Nm |
Torque RPM | 1750 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | 4WD |
Vehicle Length | 4860 mm | 3450 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1940 mm | 1470 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1770 mm | 1700 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2940 mm | 2040 mm |