2009 BMW X5 vs. 1996 BMW Z3
To start off, 2009 BMW X5 is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 BMW Z3. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 BMW Z3 would be higher. At 2,979 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 BMW X5 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 BMW X5 (265 HP @ 4200 RPM) has 64 more horse power than 1996 BMW Z3. (201 HP @ 5300 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 BMW X5 should accelerate faster than 1996 BMW Z3.
Because 2009 BMW X5 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1996 BMW Z3. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 BMW X5 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 BMW X5 (576 Nm @ 1750 RPM) has 301 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 BMW Z3. (275 Nm @ 3950 RPM). This means 2009 BMW X5 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 BMW Z3.
Compare all specifications:
2009 BMW X5 | 1996 BMW Z3 | |
Make | BMW | BMW |
Model | X5 | Z3 |
Year Released | 2009 | 1996 |
Body Type | SUV | Convertible |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2979 cc | 2926 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 265 HP | 201 HP |
Engine RPM | 4200 RPM | 5300 RPM |
Torque | 576 Nm | 275 Nm |
Torque RPM | 1750 RPM | 3950 RPM |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4860 mm | 4030 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1940 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1770 mm | 1290 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2940 mm | 2450 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 85 L | 51 L |