2009 BMW X5 vs. 2001 Mazda CU-X
To start off, 2009 BMW X5 is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 Mazda CU-X. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 Mazda CU-X would be higher. At 2,979 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 BMW X5 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 BMW X5 (265 HP @ 4200 RPM) has 166 more horse power than 2001 Mazda CU-X. (99 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 BMW X5 should accelerate faster than 2001 Mazda CU-X.
Because 2009 BMW X5 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2001 Mazda CU-X. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 BMW X5 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 BMW X5 (576 Nm) has 336 more torque (in Nm) than 2001 Mazda CU-X. (240 Nm). This means 2009 BMW X5 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2001 Mazda CU-X.
Compare all specifications:
| 2009 BMW X5 | 2001 Mazda CU-X | |
| Make | BMW | Mazda |
| Model | X5 | CU-X |
| Year Released | 2009 | 2001 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2979 cc | 1970 cc |
| Horse Power | 265 HP | 99 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4200 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Torque | 576 Nm | 240 Nm |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Wheelbase Size | 2940 mm | 2680 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 85 L | 80 L |
