2009 BMW X5 vs. 2004 Nissan Armada
To start off, 2009 BMW X5 is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Nissan Armada. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Nissan Armada would be higher. At 5,556 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Nissan Armada is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 BMW X5 (350 HP @ 6300 RPM) has 45 more horse power than 2004 Nissan Armada. (305 HP @ 3600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 BMW X5 should accelerate faster than 2004 Nissan Armada. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Nissan Armada weights approximately 749 kg more than 2009 BMW X5.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Nissan Armada (522 Nm) has 46 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 BMW X5. (476 Nm). This means 2004 Nissan Armada will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 BMW X5.
Compare all specifications:
2009 BMW X5 | 2004 Nissan Armada | |
Make | BMW | Nissan |
Model | X5 | Armada |
Year Released | 2009 | 2004 |
Body Type | SUV | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4799 cc | 5556 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 350 HP | 305 HP |
Engine RPM | 6300 RPM | 3600 RPM |
Torque | 476 Nm | 522 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 93 mm | 98.1 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 88.3 mm | 92 mm |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1525 kg | 2274 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4860 mm | 5260 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1940 mm | 2010 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1740 mm | 1980 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2940 mm | 3140 mm |
Fuel Consumption | 12.4 L/100km | 12.4 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 12.5 L/100km | 14.7 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 85 L | 106 L |