2009 BMW X5 vs. 2005 MCC Crossblade
To start off, 2009 BMW X5 is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 MCC Crossblade. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 MCC Crossblade would be higher. At 4,799 cc (8 cylinders), 2009 BMW X5 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 BMW X5 (350 HP) has 280 more horse power than 2005 MCC Crossblade. (70 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2009 BMW X5 should accelerate faster than 2005 MCC Crossblade.
Because 2009 BMW X5 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2005 MCC Crossblade. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 BMW X5 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 BMW X5 (475 Nm @ 3400 RPM) has 373 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 MCC Crossblade. (102 Nm @ 3210 RPM). This means 2009 BMW X5 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 MCC Crossblade. 2009 BMW X5 has automatic transmission and 2005 MCC Crossblade has manual transmission. 2005 MCC Crossblade will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2009 BMW X5 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2009 BMW X5 | 2005 MCC Crossblade | |
Make | BMW | MCC |
Model | X5 | Crossblade |
Year Released | 2009 | 2005 |
Engine Size | 4799 cc | 599 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 350 HP | 70 HP |
Torque | 475 Nm | 102 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3400 RPM | 3210 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Vehicle Length | 4860 mm | 2630 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1940 mm | 1630 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1770 mm | 1520 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2940 mm | 1810 mm |