2009 BMW X6 vs. 1964 Cadillac 62
To start off, 2009 BMW X6 is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 7,029 cc (8 cylinders), 1964 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 BMW X6 (300 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 92 more horse power than 1964 Cadillac 62. (208 HP @ 4600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 BMW X6 should accelerate faster than 1964 Cadillac 62. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 BMW X6 weights approximately 115 kg more than 1964 Cadillac 62. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
| 2009 BMW X6 | 1964 Cadillac 62 | |
| Make | BMW | Cadillac |
| Model | X6 | 62 |
| Year Released | 2009 | 1964 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2977 cc | 7029 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 300 HP | 208 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 4600 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 2145 kg | 2030 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4880 mm | 5690 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1990 mm | 2030 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1700 mm | 1370 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2940 mm | 3300 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 85 L | 75 L |
