2009 BMW X6 vs. 2004 Ford Econoline
To start off, 2009 BMW X6 is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Ford Econoline. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Ford Econoline would be higher. At 4,395 cc (8 cylinders), 2009 BMW X6 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 BMW X6 (401 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 204 more horse power than 2004 Ford Econoline. (197 HP @ 4700 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 BMW X6 should accelerate faster than 2004 Ford Econoline. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Ford Econoline weights approximately 60 kg more than 2009 BMW X6.
Because 2009 BMW X6 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2004 Ford Econoline. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 BMW X6 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 BMW X6 (610 Nm @ 1750 RPM) has 272 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Ford Econoline. (338 Nm @ 2700 RPM). This means 2009 BMW X6 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Ford Econoline.
Compare all specifications:
2009 BMW X6 | 2004 Ford Econoline | |
Make | BMW | Ford |
Model | X6 | Econoline |
Year Released | 2009 | 2004 |
Body Type | SUV | Van |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4395 cc | 4195 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 401 HP | 197 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 4700 RPM |
Torque | 610 Nm | 338 Nm |
Torque RPM | 1750 RPM | 2700 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 2265 kg | 2325 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4880 mm | 5390 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1990 mm | 2020 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1700 mm | 2060 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2940 mm | 3510 mm |