2009 BMW X6 vs. 2007 Nissan Armada
To start off, 2009 BMW X6 is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2007 Nissan Armada. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2007 Nissan Armada would be higher. At 5,552 cc (8 cylinders), 2007 Nissan Armada is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2007 Nissan Armada (318 HP @ 4900 RPM) has 86 more horse power than 2009 BMW X6. (232 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2007 Nissan Armada should accelerate faster than 2009 BMW X6.
Let's talk about torque, 2007 Nissan Armada (522 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 2 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 BMW X6. (520 Nm @ 2000 RPM). This means 2007 Nissan Armada will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 BMW X6.
Compare all specifications:
2009 BMW X6 | 2007 Nissan Armada | |
Make | BMW | Nissan |
Model | X6 | Armada |
Year Released | 2009 | 2007 |
Body Type | SUV | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2993 cc | 5552 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 232 HP | 318 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 4900 RPM |
Torque | 520 Nm | 522 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2000 RPM | 3600 RPM |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Diesel |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 7 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4880 mm | 5260 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1990 mm | 2010 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1700 mm | 1980 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2940 mm | 3140 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 8.2 L/100km | 15.7 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 85 L | 106 L |