2009 BMW X6 vs. 2010 Holden Epica
To start off, 2010 Holden Epica is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2009 BMW X6. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2009 BMW X6 would be higher. At 2,977 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 BMW X6 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 BMW X6 (300 HP) has 152 more horse power than 2010 Holden Epica. (148 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2009 BMW X6 should accelerate faster than 2010 Holden Epica.
Because 2009 BMW X6 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2010 Holden Epica. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 BMW X6 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 BMW X6 (407 Nm) has 87 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Holden Epica. (320 Nm). This means 2009 BMW X6 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Holden Epica.
Compare all specifications:
2009 BMW X6 | 2010 Holden Epica | |
Make | BMW | Holden |
Model | X6 | Epica |
Year Released | 2009 | 2010 |
Body Type | SUV | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2977 cc | 1991 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 300 HP | 148 HP |
Torque | 407 Nm | 320 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Diesel |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4880 mm | 4805 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1990 mm | 1810 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1700 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2940 mm | 2700 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 10.9 L/100km | 7.5 L/100km |