2009 BMW X6 vs. 2012 Holden Calais
To start off, 2012 Holden Calais is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2009 BMW X6. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2009 BMW X6 would be higher. At 3,600 cc (6 cylinders), 2012 Holden Calais is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 BMW X6 (300 HP) has 22 more horse power than 2012 Holden Calais. (278 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2009 BMW X6 should accelerate faster than 2012 Holden Calais.
Because 2009 BMW X6 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2012 Holden Calais. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 BMW X6 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 BMW X6 (407 Nm) has 57 more torque (in Nm) than 2012 Holden Calais. (350 Nm). This means 2009 BMW X6 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2012 Holden Calais.
Compare all specifications:
| 2009 BMW X6 | 2012 Holden Calais | |
| Make | BMW | Holden |
| Model | X6 | Calais |
| Year Released | 2009 | 2012 |
| Body Type | SUV | Sedan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2977 cc | 3600 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 300 HP | 278 HP |
| Torque | 407 Nm | 350 Nm |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
| Fuel Consumption Overall | 10.9 L/100km | 9.3 L/100km |
