2009 BMW X6 vs. 2012 Holden Commodore
To start off, 2012 Holden Commodore is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2009 BMW X6. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2009 BMW X6 would be higher. At 5,976 cc (8 cylinders), 2012 Holden Commodore is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 BMW X6 (401 HP) has 41 more horse power than 2012 Holden Commodore. (360 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2009 BMW X6 should accelerate faster than 2012 Holden Commodore.
Because 2009 BMW X6 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2012 Holden Commodore. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 BMW X6 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 BMW X6 (610 Nm) has 320 more torque (in Nm) than 2012 Holden Commodore. (290 Nm). This means 2009 BMW X6 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2012 Holden Commodore. 2009 BMW X6 has automatic transmission and 2012 Holden Commodore has manual transmission. 2012 Holden Commodore will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2009 BMW X6 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2009 BMW X6 | 2012 Holden Commodore | |
Make | BMW | Holden |
Model | X6 | Commodore |
Year Released | 2009 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4395 cc | 5976 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 401 HP | 360 HP |
Torque | 610 Nm | 290 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 12.5 L/100km | 14.4 L/100km |