2009 BMW Z4 vs. 1965 NSU Prinz

To start off, 2009 BMW Z4 is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 NSU Prinz. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 NSU Prinz would be higher. At 2,494 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 BMW Z4 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 BMW Z4 (215 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 185 more horse power than 1965 NSU Prinz. (30 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 BMW Z4 should accelerate faster than 1965 NSU Prinz. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 BMW Z4 weights approximately 725 kg more than 1965 NSU Prinz. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 BMW Z4 (250 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 208 more torque (in Nm) than 1965 NSU Prinz. (42 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 2009 BMW Z4 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1965 NSU Prinz. 2009 BMW Z4 has automatic transmission and 1965 NSU Prinz has manual transmission. 1965 NSU Prinz will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2009 BMW Z4 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications:

2009 BMW Z4 1965 NSU Prinz
Make BMW NSU
Model Z4 Prinz
Year Released 2009 1965
Engine Position Front Rear
Engine Size 2494 cc 583 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 2 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Valves per Cylinder 4 valves 2 valves
Horse Power 215 HP 30 HP
Engine RPM 6500 RPM 5500 RPM
Torque 250 Nm 42 Nm
Torque RPM 2000 RPM 3200 RPM
Engine Bore Size 82 mm 76 mm
Engine Stroke Size 78.8 mm 66 mm
Engine Compression Ratio 10.5:1 7.5:1
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Rear Rear
Transmission Type Automatic Manual
Number of Seats 2 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 2 doors 2 doors
Vehicle Weight 1290 kg 565 kg
Vehicle Length 4100 mm 3570 mm
Vehicle Width 1790 mm 1530 mm
Vehicle Height 1310 mm 1240 mm
Wheelbase Size 2500 mm 2010 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 55 L 37 L