2009 BMW Z4 vs. 1976 Rover 2000
To start off, 2009 BMW Z4 is newer by 33 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1976 Rover 2000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1976 Rover 2000 would be higher. At 3,532 cc (8 cylinders), 1976 Rover 2000 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 BMW Z4 (148 HP @ 6200 RPM) has 6 more horse power than 1976 Rover 2000. (142 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 BMW Z4 should accelerate faster than 1976 Rover 2000. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1976 Rover 2000 weights approximately 37 kg more than 2009 BMW Z4.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1976 Rover 2000 (272 Nm @ 2600 RPM) has 72 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 BMW Z4. (200 Nm @ 3600 RPM). This means 1976 Rover 2000 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 BMW Z4.
Compare all specifications:
2009 BMW Z4 | 1976 Rover 2000 | |
Make | BMW | Rover |
Model | Z4 | 2000 |
Year Released | 2009 | 1976 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1995 cc | 3532 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 148 HP | 142 HP |
Engine RPM | 6200 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 200 Nm | 272 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3600 RPM | 2600 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1295 kg | 1332 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4100 mm | 4550 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1310 mm | 1690 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1790 mm | 1400 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2500 mm | 2640 mm |