2009 BMW Z4 vs. 2004 Mercury Sable
To start off, 2009 BMW Z4 is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Mercury Sable. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Mercury Sable would be higher. At 2,996 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 BMW Z4 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 BMW Z4 (261 HP) has 106 more horse power than 2004 Mercury Sable. (155 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2009 BMW Z4 should accelerate faster than 2004 Mercury Sable. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Mercury Sable weights approximately 118 kg more than 2009 BMW Z4.
Let's talk about torque, 2009 BMW Z4 (315 Nm) has 64 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Mercury Sable. (251 Nm). This means 2009 BMW Z4 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Mercury Sable.
Compare all specifications:
2009 BMW Z4 | 2004 Mercury Sable | |
Make | BMW | Mercury |
Model | Z4 | Sable |
Year Released | 2009 | 2004 |
Body Type | Coupe | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2996 cc | 2983 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 261 HP | 155 HP |
Torque | 315 Nm | 251 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 85.1 mm | 89 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 88 mm | 79 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.7:1 | 9.7:1 |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 6 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1395 kg | 1513 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4100 mm | 5080 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1860 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1270 mm | 1420 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2500 mm | 2760 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 8.9 L/100km | 10.8 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 55 L | 68 L |