2009 BMW Z4 vs. 2006 Buick Rainier
To start off, 2009 BMW Z4 is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 Buick Rainier. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 Buick Rainier would be higher. At 4,163 cc (6 cylinders), 2006 Buick Rainier is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 BMW Z4 (335 HP @ 7900 RPM) has 44 more horse power than 2006 Buick Rainier. (291 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 BMW Z4 should accelerate faster than 2006 Buick Rainier. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Buick Rainier weights approximately 25 kg more than 2009 BMW Z4.
Because 2006 Buick Rainier is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2009 BMW Z4. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Buick Rainier will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Buick Rainier (376 Nm @ 4800 RPM) has 61 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 BMW Z4. (315 Nm @ 2750 RPM). This means 2006 Buick Rainier will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 BMW Z4.
Compare all specifications:
2009 BMW Z4 | 2006 Buick Rainier | |
Make | BMW | Buick |
Model | Z4 | Rainier |
Year Released | 2009 | 2006 |
Body Type | Convertible | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2979 cc | 4163 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 335 HP | 291 HP |
Engine RPM | 7900 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 315 Nm | 376 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2750 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1525 kg | 1550 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4100 mm | 4920 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1920 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1310 mm | 1900 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2500 mm | 2880 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 9.1 L/100km | 13.1 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 55 L | 83 L |