2009 BMW Z4 vs. 2013 Mini Countryman
To start off, 2013 Mini Countryman is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2009 BMW Z4. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2009 BMW Z4 would be higher. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 BMW Z4 weights approximately 55 kg more than 2013 Mini Countryman.
Because 2009 BMW Z4 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2009 BMW Z4. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Mini Countryman, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 BMW Z4 (315 Nm @ 2750 RPM) has 160 more torque (in Nm) than 2013 Mini Countryman. (155 Nm @ 4250 RPM). This means 2009 BMW Z4 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2013 Mini Countryman.
Compare all specifications:
2009 BMW Z4 | 2013 Mini Countryman | |
Make | BMW | Mini |
Model | Z4 | Countryman |
Year Released | 2009 | 2013 |
Body Type | Coupe | Crossover |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 261 HP | 0 HP |
Engine RPM | 6600 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 315 Nm | 155 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2750 RPM | 4250 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 85.1 mm | 77 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 88 mm | 85 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed manual |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1395 kg | 1340 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4100 mm | 4097 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1993 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1270 mm | 1561 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2500 mm | 2595 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 55 L | 47 L |