2009 Brilliance BS4 vs. 2000 Ford ST 460
To start off, 2009 Brilliance BS4 is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Ford ST 460. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Ford ST 460 would be higher. At 4,600 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 Ford ST 460 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Ford ST 460 (460 HP @ 6150 RPM) has 361 more horse power than 2009 Brilliance BS4. (99 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Ford ST 460 should accelerate faster than 2009 Brilliance BS4.
Because 2000 Ford ST 460 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2000 Ford ST 460. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Brilliance BS4, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Ford ST 460 (178 Nm) has 44 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Brilliance BS4. (134 Nm). This means 2000 Ford ST 460 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Brilliance BS4.
Compare all specifications:
| 2009 Brilliance BS4 | 2000 Ford ST 460 | |
| Make | Brilliance | Ford |
| Model | BS4 | ST 460 |
| Year Released | 2009 | 2000 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1582 cc | 4600 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 99 HP | 460 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 6150 RPM |
| Torque | 134 Nm | 178 Nm |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 4660 mm | 4620 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 1830 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2800 mm | 2580 mm |
