2009 Buick LaCrosse vs. 1972 Chrysler 160
To start off, 2009 Buick LaCrosse is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Chrysler 160. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Chrysler 160 would be higher. At 3,786 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Buick LaCrosse is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Buick LaCrosse (197 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 118 more horse power than 1972 Chrysler 160. (79 HP @ 5600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Buick LaCrosse should accelerate faster than 1972 Chrysler 160.
Because 1972 Chrysler 160 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1972 Chrysler 160. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Buick LaCrosse, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Buick LaCrosse (230 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 105 more torque (in Nm) than 1972 Chrysler 160. (125 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2009 Buick LaCrosse will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1972 Chrysler 160.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Buick LaCrosse | 1972 Chrysler 160 | |
Make | Buick | Chrysler |
Model | LaCrosse | 160 |
Year Released | 2009 | 1972 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3786 cc | 1639 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 197 HP | 79 HP |
Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Torque | 230 Nm | 125 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Vehicle Length | 5040 mm | 4540 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1730 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1440 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2810 mm | 2680 mm |