2009 Buick LaCrosse vs. 2000 Chrysler 300

To start off, 2009 Buick LaCrosse is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Chrysler 300. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Chrysler 300 would be higher. At 5,699 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 Chrysler 300 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Chrysler 300 (253 HP) has 53 more horse power than 2009 Buick LaCrosse. (200 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Chrysler 300 should accelerate faster than 2009 Buick LaCrosse. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Buick LaCrosse weights approximately 337 kg more than 2000 Chrysler 300.

Because 2000 Chrysler 300 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2000 Chrysler 300. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Buick LaCrosse, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Chrysler 300 (479 Nm) has 167 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Buick LaCrosse. (312 Nm). This means 2000 Chrysler 300 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Buick LaCrosse.

Compare all specifications: