2009 Buick Lucerne vs. 1954 Buick 40
To start off, 2009 Buick Lucerne is newer by 55 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1954 Buick 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1954 Buick 40 would be higher. At 4,328 cc (8 cylinders), 1954 Buick 40 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Buick Lucerne (227 HP @ 5700 RPM) has 79 more horse power than 1954 Buick 40. (148 HP @ 4200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Buick Lucerne should accelerate faster than 1954 Buick 40. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1954 Buick 40 weights approximately 58 kg more than 2009 Buick Lucerne.
Because 1954 Buick 40 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1954 Buick 40. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Buick Lucerne, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1954 Buick 40 (325 Nm @ 2400 RPM) has 4 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Buick Lucerne. (321 Nm @ 2300 RPM). This means 1954 Buick 40 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Buick Lucerne.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Buick Lucerne | 1954 Buick 40 | |
Make | Buick | Buick |
Model | Lucerne | 40 |
Year Released | 2009 | 1954 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3880 cc | 4328 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 227 HP | 148 HP |
Engine RPM | 5700 RPM | 4200 RPM |
Torque | 321 Nm | 325 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2300 RPM | 2400 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1617 kg | 1675 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2940 mm | 3110 mm |