2009 Buick Lucerne vs. 1974 Volvo 140
To start off, 2009 Buick Lucerne is newer by 35 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1974 Volvo 140. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1974 Volvo 140 would be higher. At 3,880 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Buick Lucerne is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Buick Lucerne (227 HP @ 5700 RPM) has 146 more horse power than 1974 Volvo 140. (81 HP @ 4700 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Buick Lucerne should accelerate faster than 1974 Volvo 140.
Because 1974 Volvo 140 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1974 Volvo 140. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Buick Lucerne, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Buick Lucerne (321 Nm @ 2300 RPM) has 164 more torque (in Nm) than 1974 Volvo 140. (157 Nm @ 2300 RPM). This means 2009 Buick Lucerne will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1974 Volvo 140.
Compare all specifications:
| 2009 Buick Lucerne | 1974 Volvo 140 | |
| Make | Buick | Volvo |
| Model | Lucerne | 140 |
| Year Released | 2009 | 1974 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3880 cc | 1986 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 227 HP | 81 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5700 RPM | 4700 RPM |
| Torque | 321 Nm | 157 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2300 RPM | 2300 RPM |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Width | 1880 mm | 1720 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1480 mm | 1450 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2940 mm | 2620 mm |
