2009 Buick Lucerne vs. 2003 Mazda 3
To start off, 2009 Buick Lucerne is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Mazda 3. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Mazda 3 would be higher. At 3,879 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Buick Lucerne is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Buick Lucerne (224 HP @ 5700 RPM) has 64 more horse power than 2003 Mazda 3. (160 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Buick Lucerne should accelerate faster than 2003 Mazda 3.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Buick Lucerne (237 Nm @ 3200 RPM) has 42 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Mazda 3. (195 Nm @ 4500 RPM). This means 2009 Buick Lucerne will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Mazda 3.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Buick Lucerne | 2003 Mazda 3 | |
Make | Buick | Mazda |
Model | Lucerne | 3 |
Year Released | 2009 | 2003 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3879 cc | 1999 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 224 HP | 160 HP |
Engine RPM | 5700 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 237 Nm | 195 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3200 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.8:1 | 11.0:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 6 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Width | 1880 mm | 1760 mm |
Fuel Consumption City | 13.8 L/100km | 11.7 L/100km |