2009 Buick Lucerne vs. 2012 Mitsubishi i-MiEV
To start off, 2012 Mitsubishi i-MiEV is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2009 Buick Lucerne. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2009 Buick Lucerne would be higher. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Buick Lucerne weights approximately 447 kg more than 2012 Mitsubishi i-MiEV.
Because 2012 Mitsubishi i-MiEV is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2012 Mitsubishi i-MiEV. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Buick Lucerne, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2009 Buick Lucerne | 2012 Mitsubishi i-MiEV | |
| Make | Buick | Mitsubishi |
| Model | Lucerne | i-MiEV |
| Year Released | 2009 | 2012 |
| Body Type | Sedan | Hatchback |
| Engine Position | Front | Rear |
| Horse Power | 227 HP | 0 HP |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Single Speed |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1617 kg | 1170 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5170 mm | 3678 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1880 mm | 1585 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1480 mm | 1615 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2940 mm | 2550 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Highway | 9.1 L/100km | 2.4 L/100km |
| Fuel Consumption City | 13.8 L/100km | 1.9 L/100km |
